I don't think "science", as we call it, is very reliable. Historically, science hasn't maintained very much credibility: only a hundred years ago, bloodletting was still a popular remedy. Lobotomies enjoyed their peak less than fifty years ago.
However, Darwin theory has always felt, to me, affirmative to "Creation" theory: it blows my mind how closely evolution mirrors the order of the events of creation week: first, just rocks. Next, water. Then, aquatic animals. Birds, land animals, and, last, people.
Any thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think you are looking to science for facts. That is not what science gives us, science gives us the means to "seek" the truth. If you notice just about everything in science is a theory, hence not fully based in fact yet. I think you also have to have a separation between the spiritual and the physical to a degree, so saying that science and theology are not matching may just mean that the pieces you are looking at are not meant to match at all...ever.
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!
Post a Comment